Can ChatGPT Solve HackerRank Questions? A Detailed Analysis

As the role of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow, many industries are embracing AI tools for various functions, and technical hiring is no exception. One question that has emerged within this space is: Can ChatGPT solve HackerRank questions?

ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is an advanced AI language model that is capable of generating human-like text, and it has become an increasingly popular tool in the world of coding interviews. In this article, we will dive deep into how well ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions, looking at real-world experiments, expert opinions, and its limitations. By the end of this post, you will have a clearer idea of whether ChatGPT can be relied upon in coding assessments and what role AI should play in the future of technical hiring.

Understanding ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Coding

Before answering the question, can ChatGPT solve HackerRank questions, it’s important to understand its core functionality. ChatGPT is an AI model built on the GPT-4 architecture, which has been trained on vast amounts of data, including text, code, and programming logic. This enables it to understand a wide range of queries, from casual conversations to complex technical problems.

When it comes to coding challenges, ChatGPT processes the problem by breaking it down into smaller tasks and leveraging its knowledge of programming languages, algorithms, and problem-solving patterns. It then generates code that aligns with common programming practices and frameworks.

However, ChatGPT’s abilities have limits. For basic problems, especially those that are common and well-defined, ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions with relative ease. For example, problems involving basic arrays, loops, and strings are within its wheelhouse. But as the complexity of the challenge increases—especially with highly customized or creative problem-solving tasks—ChatGPT’s limitations start to show.

Real-World Experiments: ChatGPT vs. HackerRank Challenges

Andrew Wegner’s Tests

Andrew Wegner, a tech expert, put ChatGPT through a series of HackerRank challenges to gauge its capabilities in solving them. He tested it with problems ranging from easy to hard levels, including problems like Triangle Quest, Iterables, and Validating Postal Codes.

Wegner found that ChatGPT was successful in solving simple tasks involving straightforward logic, such as those requiring mathematical calculations or basic algorithms. For example, in the Triangle Quest problem, which involves generating a pattern of numbers, ChatGPT produced a correct solution almost instantly.

However, as the difficulty level increased, ChatGPT struggled with tasks that required more nuanced problem-solving. For example, in problems involving LaTeX formatting or complex string manipulations, ChatGPT’s answers were often incomplete or incorrect. In these cases, human intervention was necessary to fix the code and ensure it met the problem’s specifications. This suggests that while ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions, it may need human input for higher-level challenges.

eFinancialCareers’ Attempt

The team at eFinancialCareers also tested ChatGPT on a coding challenge using C#. Their experience showed that while ChatGPT can generate code, it doesn’t always get it right. The generated code often contained errors, such as incorrect syntax or logic flaws that led to runtime issues. This further underscores that ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions, but its solutions are not always guaranteed to be perfect.

In their conclusion, they emphasized that ChatGPT is a useful tool for quick assistance, but it should not be relied upon as the primary source of solutions. For this reason, candidates and recruiters alike should view ChatGPT as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human expertise.

HackerRank’s View: AI in Technical Hiring

From the perspective of HackerRank, ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions effectively, especially those that involve basic programming tasks or widely-known algorithms. HackerRank emphasizes that ChatGPT’s strength lies in its speed and its ability to generate code based on a broad base of knowledge.

However, the platform also points out that ChatGPT struggles with problems that require deep problem-solving skills or tasks where creativity and critical thinking are essential. Problems that require a thorough understanding of algorithms, problem optimization, or context-specific knowledge tend to expose the weaknesses of AI models like ChatGPT.

Therefore, while ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions, its solutions are often too basic for high-level tasks and can lack the depth and reasoning that recruiters look for when assessing candidates’ problem-solving abilities.

So, Can ChatGPT Reliably Solve HackerRank Questions?

The answer is nuanced: Yes, but with limitations.

• Yes, ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions that involve standard algorithms, basic problem-solving, and well-defined challenges. These include simple tasks like sorting algorithms, array manipulations, and pattern generation.
  
  
• No, ChatGPT can struggle with advanced problems that require creative problem-solving, custom logic, or advanced knowledge of specialized algorithms.
  
  

For medium and hard-level problems that involve edge cases, complex data structures, or system-level design, ChatGPT may provide incomplete or inaccurate solutions. In these cases, human intervention is still necessary to ensure the solution is fully functional and optimized.

Thus, while ChatGPT can solve HackerRank questions, it is important to verify its solutions and not rely on it entirely, especially for challenging problems that require deeper expertise.

How Hiring and Recruitment Are Evolving

As AI tools like ChatGPT become more embedded in the recruitment process, hiring practices are evolving. Employers now face the challenge of ensuring candidates can’t rely solely on AI-generated answers to solve HackerRank questions. Here are some trends emerging in technical hiring:

• Proctoring and plagiarism detection tools: These tools help employers monitor candidates and detect AI-assisted cheating during coding assessments.
  
  
• Creating unique challenges: Companies are increasingly designing custom problems that are not easily solvable by AI, ensuring candidates are tested on their genuine skills.
  
  
• Interview-as-a-Service platforms: Platforms like Panls are becoming more popular, providing expert interviewers on demand to assess candidates holistically.
  
  

These changes are shaping a new era in technical hiring, where AI tools are valuable assistants but human judgment remains crucial.

Best Practices for Candidates Using ChatGPT in Interviews

Candidates looking to use ChatGPT as part of their interview preparation should follow these best practices:

• Practice with ChatGPT, but focus on understanding the underlying concepts behind coding problems. Use it as a tool for guidance, not a crutch.
  
  
• Verify solutions generated by ChatGPT, as they may contain errors. Debugging your own code is an essential skill in coding interviews.
  
  
• Use ChatGPT to learn faster, but don’t solely rely on it for solving HackerRank questions. Focus on developing your own problem-solving skills and creative thinking.
  
  

By incorporating ChatGPT as part of your preparation, you can enhance your problem-solving approach while ensuring that your solutions are accurate and reliable.

Best Practices for Employers Combating AI-Assisted Cheating

For employers, the rise of ChatGPT and similar tools poses new challenges in ensuring candidates are genuinely solving coding problems. Here are some strategies for combating AI-assisted cheating:

• Redesign coding challenges to focus on problem-solving strategies rather than just code output. This encourages candidates to demonstrate their thought process.
  
  
• Implement proctoring and behavior monitoring to detect signs of cheating or external assistance during coding assessments.
  
  
• Use project-based interviews that require candidates to demonstrate real-world application of their skills, which is much harder for AI tools like ChatGPT to handle effectively.
  
  

These approaches can help ensure that AI-assisted cheating doesn’t undermine the integrity of technical hiring.

Future of Technical Hiring: Humans and AI Together

The future of technical hiring will likely see more collaboration between AI tools and human recruiters. As AI models like ChatGPT continue to improve, developers may need to become “prompt engineers”, skilled at crafting the best queries to get the most effective code from AI. However, human judgment will remain essential, especially in assessing creativity, problem-solving strategies, and real-world experience.

The key to success will be the balance between human expertise and AI assistance. Adaptability will be the most important skill for developers and recruiters in this new landscape.

Streamline Your Hiring with Panls

Ready to future-proof your technical hiring? Instead of relying solely on outdated recruitment methods, leverage Panls’ Interview As A Service (IAAS) platform.

•  Access a network of expert technical interviewers on-demand
•  Speed up your hiring process
•  Ensure quality and unbiased evaluation

Book a Demo with Panls Today!

Conclusion

So, can ChatGPT solve HackerRank questions? The answer depends on the complexity of the problem. While ChatGPT can solve many HackerRank questions, especially those that involve standard algorithms and basic logic, it falls short when faced with complex, creative, or custom challenges. Human review is still crucial to ensure accuracy and depth. ChatGPT is a powerful assistant but cannot replace the critical thinking and problem-solving skills that humans bring to the table.

Frequently Asked Questions